<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strict new lawyer advertising ethics rules are being proposed in New York.  Will you have to redesign your ads?</title>
	<link>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/</link>
	<description>Lawyer Advertising Blog - Articles on Law Firm Advertising &#038; Branding, Lawyer Advertising Ethics, Attorney Advertising on TV, Radio, Billboards, Yellow Pages, Internet; 1-800 Lawyer Advertising Vanity Phone Numbers, Lawyer Marketing and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: fatlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-903</link>
		<author>fatlaw</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that many of the current rules should be reduced and enforced. Unfortunately it has been the norm of the disciplinary committee to increase and ignore the rules.

One thing that deeply concerns me is 1200.6 (o) (1) (ii). Since video advertisements are now becoming common on the internet, and this rule can be construed at their whim to cover online videos, and perhaps even other types of online advertisements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that many of the current rules should be reduced and enforced. Unfortunately it has been the norm of the disciplinary committee to increase and ignore the rules.</p>
<p>One thing that deeply concerns me is 1200.6 (o) (1) (ii). Since video advertisements are now becoming common on the internet, and this rule can be construed at their whim to cover online videos, and perhaps even other types of online advertisements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Soelberg</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-796</link>
		<author>Micah Soelberg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>If they are not enforcing the current rules then what good will new rules do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are not enforcing the current rules then what good will new rules do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSU Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-634</link>
		<author>LSU Tiger</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lawyer-advertising-blog.com/2006/09/15/strict-new-lawyer-advertising-ethics-rules-are-being-proposed-in-new-york-will-you-have-to-redesign-your-ads/#comment-634</guid>
		<description>I think the proposal that existing client testimonials not being usuable is somewhat pointless.  Are you going to have to select from a roster of clients from 10 years ago when your firm was still underdeveloped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the proposal that existing client testimonials not being usuable is somewhat pointless.  Are you going to have to select from a roster of clients from 10 years ago when your firm was still underdeveloped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
